An appraisal

How notifiable infectious diseases are reported by Hungarian family physicians

Katalin Vraukó, Zoltán Jancsó, L. Kalabay, Andrea Lukács, Gabriella Maráczi, Lajos Mester, Anna Nánási, József Rinfel, Tamás Sárosi, Ferenc Tamás, Albert Varga, József Vitrai, Imre Rurik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Within the frame of National Epidemiological Surveillance System, family physicians have an obligation to report infections and suspicions cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, daily practice and the reporting activities of Hungarian family physicians regarding to infectious diseases. Methods: A self-administered survey was developed, validated and used. The survey was completed by family physicians who had taken part in continuous medical educational programmes of all Hungarian medical faculties. The questionnaire, consisting demographic questions and 10 statements about their reporting habits were completed by 347 doctors, 8% of the total number of family physicians. The data were processed in a cross-sectional design with general linear model. Results: According to the majority of responders, the current reporting system works efficiently. Rural physicians were mainly agreed, that reporting is not a simply obligation, it is a professional task as well. They were less hindered in daily work by reporting activities, waited less for laboratory confirmation before reporting, reported suspicious cases more frequently. Practitioner's based in urban settlements preferred to await laboratory tests before reporting and were hindered less by failures of the electronic reporting system. Older physicians trusted more in the recent system and they wished to increase the number of reports. Female physicians have higher consciousness in epidemiology. They were mostly in agreement that even severe infectious diseases can be diagnosed at primary care level and their daily practices were less burdened by reporting duties. Conclusions: Both the epidemiological knowledge of general practitioners' and the electronic surveillance systems should be improved. There is a need to develope the electronic infrastructure of primary care. More and regular control is also expected by the health care authorities, beside the synthesis of professional and governmental expectations and regulations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number45
JournalBMC Infectious Diseases
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 17 2018

Fingerprint

Family Physicians
Communicable Diseases
Physicians
Primary Health Care
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Medical Faculties
Consciousness
General Practitioners
Habits
Linear Models
Epidemiology
Demography
Delivery of Health Care
Infection
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Family physician
  • Hungary
  • Infections
  • Infectious diseases
  • Primary care
  • Reporting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

An appraisal : How notifiable infectious diseases are reported by Hungarian family physicians. / Vraukó, Katalin; Jancsó, Zoltán; Kalabay, L.; Lukács, Andrea; Maráczi, Gabriella; Mester, Lajos; Nánási, Anna; Rinfel, József; Sárosi, Tamás; Tamás, Ferenc; Varga, Albert; Vitrai, József; Rurik, Imre.

In: BMC Infectious Diseases, Vol. 18, No. 1, 45, 17.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vraukó, K, Jancsó, Z, Kalabay, L, Lukács, A, Maráczi, G, Mester, L, Nánási, A, Rinfel, J, Sárosi, T, Tamás, F, Varga, A, Vitrai, J & Rurik, I 2018, 'An appraisal: How notifiable infectious diseases are reported by Hungarian family physicians', BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, no. 1, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-2948-5
Vraukó, Katalin ; Jancsó, Zoltán ; Kalabay, L. ; Lukács, Andrea ; Maráczi, Gabriella ; Mester, Lajos ; Nánási, Anna ; Rinfel, József ; Sárosi, Tamás ; Tamás, Ferenc ; Varga, Albert ; Vitrai, József ; Rurik, Imre. / An appraisal : How notifiable infectious diseases are reported by Hungarian family physicians. In: BMC Infectious Diseases. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{dd628029942442cba637ce0298e20812,
title = "An appraisal: How notifiable infectious diseases are reported by Hungarian family physicians",
abstract = "Background: Within the frame of National Epidemiological Surveillance System, family physicians have an obligation to report infections and suspicions cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, daily practice and the reporting activities of Hungarian family physicians regarding to infectious diseases. Methods: A self-administered survey was developed, validated and used. The survey was completed by family physicians who had taken part in continuous medical educational programmes of all Hungarian medical faculties. The questionnaire, consisting demographic questions and 10 statements about their reporting habits were completed by 347 doctors, 8{\%} of the total number of family physicians. The data were processed in a cross-sectional design with general linear model. Results: According to the majority of responders, the current reporting system works efficiently. Rural physicians were mainly agreed, that reporting is not a simply obligation, it is a professional task as well. They were less hindered in daily work by reporting activities, waited less for laboratory confirmation before reporting, reported suspicious cases more frequently. Practitioner's based in urban settlements preferred to await laboratory tests before reporting and were hindered less by failures of the electronic reporting system. Older physicians trusted more in the recent system and they wished to increase the number of reports. Female physicians have higher consciousness in epidemiology. They were mostly in agreement that even severe infectious diseases can be diagnosed at primary care level and their daily practices were less burdened by reporting duties. Conclusions: Both the epidemiological knowledge of general practitioners' and the electronic surveillance systems should be improved. There is a need to develope the electronic infrastructure of primary care. More and regular control is also expected by the health care authorities, beside the synthesis of professional and governmental expectations and regulations.",
keywords = "Family physician, Hungary, Infections, Infectious diseases, Primary care, Reporting",
author = "Katalin Vrauk{\'o} and Zolt{\'a}n Jancs{\'o} and L. Kalabay and Andrea Luk{\'a}cs and Gabriella Mar{\'a}czi and Lajos Mester and Anna N{\'a}n{\'a}si and J{\'o}zsef Rinfel and Tam{\'a}s S{\'a}rosi and Ferenc Tam{\'a}s and Albert Varga and J{\'o}zsef Vitrai and Imre Rurik",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1186/s12879-018-2948-5",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Infectious Diseases",
issn = "1471-2334",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An appraisal

T2 - How notifiable infectious diseases are reported by Hungarian family physicians

AU - Vraukó, Katalin

AU - Jancsó, Zoltán

AU - Kalabay, L.

AU - Lukács, Andrea

AU - Maráczi, Gabriella

AU - Mester, Lajos

AU - Nánási, Anna

AU - Rinfel, József

AU - Sárosi, Tamás

AU - Tamás, Ferenc

AU - Varga, Albert

AU - Vitrai, József

AU - Rurik, Imre

PY - 2018/1/17

Y1 - 2018/1/17

N2 - Background: Within the frame of National Epidemiological Surveillance System, family physicians have an obligation to report infections and suspicions cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, daily practice and the reporting activities of Hungarian family physicians regarding to infectious diseases. Methods: A self-administered survey was developed, validated and used. The survey was completed by family physicians who had taken part in continuous medical educational programmes of all Hungarian medical faculties. The questionnaire, consisting demographic questions and 10 statements about their reporting habits were completed by 347 doctors, 8% of the total number of family physicians. The data were processed in a cross-sectional design with general linear model. Results: According to the majority of responders, the current reporting system works efficiently. Rural physicians were mainly agreed, that reporting is not a simply obligation, it is a professional task as well. They were less hindered in daily work by reporting activities, waited less for laboratory confirmation before reporting, reported suspicious cases more frequently. Practitioner's based in urban settlements preferred to await laboratory tests before reporting and were hindered less by failures of the electronic reporting system. Older physicians trusted more in the recent system and they wished to increase the number of reports. Female physicians have higher consciousness in epidemiology. They were mostly in agreement that even severe infectious diseases can be diagnosed at primary care level and their daily practices were less burdened by reporting duties. Conclusions: Both the epidemiological knowledge of general practitioners' and the electronic surveillance systems should be improved. There is a need to develope the electronic infrastructure of primary care. More and regular control is also expected by the health care authorities, beside the synthesis of professional and governmental expectations and regulations.

AB - Background: Within the frame of National Epidemiological Surveillance System, family physicians have an obligation to report infections and suspicions cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, daily practice and the reporting activities of Hungarian family physicians regarding to infectious diseases. Methods: A self-administered survey was developed, validated and used. The survey was completed by family physicians who had taken part in continuous medical educational programmes of all Hungarian medical faculties. The questionnaire, consisting demographic questions and 10 statements about their reporting habits were completed by 347 doctors, 8% of the total number of family physicians. The data were processed in a cross-sectional design with general linear model. Results: According to the majority of responders, the current reporting system works efficiently. Rural physicians were mainly agreed, that reporting is not a simply obligation, it is a professional task as well. They were less hindered in daily work by reporting activities, waited less for laboratory confirmation before reporting, reported suspicious cases more frequently. Practitioner's based in urban settlements preferred to await laboratory tests before reporting and were hindered less by failures of the electronic reporting system. Older physicians trusted more in the recent system and they wished to increase the number of reports. Female physicians have higher consciousness in epidemiology. They were mostly in agreement that even severe infectious diseases can be diagnosed at primary care level and their daily practices were less burdened by reporting duties. Conclusions: Both the epidemiological knowledge of general practitioners' and the electronic surveillance systems should be improved. There is a need to develope the electronic infrastructure of primary care. More and regular control is also expected by the health care authorities, beside the synthesis of professional and governmental expectations and regulations.

KW - Family physician

KW - Hungary

KW - Infections

KW - Infectious diseases

KW - Primary care

KW - Reporting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040734095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040734095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12879-018-2948-5

DO - 10.1186/s12879-018-2948-5

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - BMC Infectious Diseases

JF - BMC Infectious Diseases

SN - 1471-2334

IS - 1

M1 - 45

ER -