Ventajas del monitoreo de biodiversidad basado en voluntarios en Europa

Translated title of the contribution: Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe

Dirk S. Schmeller, Pierre Yves Henry, Romain Julliard, Bernd Gruber, Jean Clobert, Frank Dziock, S. Lengyel, Piotr Nowicki, Eszter DÉri, Eduardas Budrys, Tiiu Kull, Kadri Tali, Bianca Bauch, Josef Settele, Chris Van Swaay, Andrej Kobler, Valerija Babij, Eva Papastergiadou, Klaus Henle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

200 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Without robust and unbiased systems for monitoring, changes in natural systems will remain enigmatic for policy makers, leaving them without a clear idea of the consequences of any environmental policies they might adopt. Generally, biodiversity-monitoring activities are not integrated or evaluated across any large geographic region. The EuMon project conducted the first large-scale evaluation of monitoring practices in Europe through an on-line questionnaire and is reporting on the results of this survey. In September 2007 the EuMon project had documented 395 monitoring schemes for species, which represents a total annual cost of about €4 million, involving more than 46,000 persons devoting over 148,000 person-days-year to biodiversity-monitoring activities. Here we focused on the analysis of variations of monitoring practices across a set of taxonomic groups (birds, amphibians and reptiles, mammals, butterflies, plants, and other insects) and across 5 European countries (France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, and Poland). Our results suggest that the overall sampling effort of a scheme is linked with the proportion of volunteers involved in that scheme. Because precision is a function of the number of monitored sites and the number of sites is maximized by volunteer involvement, our results do not support the common belief that volunteer-based schemes are too noisy to be informative. Just the opposite, we believe volunteer-based schemes provide relatively reliable data, with state-of-the-art survey designs or data-analysis methods, and consequently can yield unbiased results. Quality of data collected by volunteers is more likely determined by survey design, analytical methodology, and communication skills within the schemes rather than by volunteer involvement per se.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)307-316
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Biology
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

volunteers
biodiversity
monitoring
survey design
communication skills
environmental policy
Lithuania
reptile
Hungary
butterfly
butterflies
amphibian
reptiles
amphibians
Europe
Poland
data analysis
mammal
questionnaires
France

Keywords

  • Biodiversity monitoring
  • Costs
  • Data collection
  • Sampling effort
  • Volunteer involvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Schmeller, D. S., Henry, P. Y., Julliard, R., Gruber, B., Clobert, J., Dziock, F., ... Henle, K. (2009). Ventajas del monitoreo de biodiversidad basado en voluntarios en Europa. Conservation Biology, 23(2), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x

Ventajas del monitoreo de biodiversidad basado en voluntarios en Europa. / Schmeller, Dirk S.; Henry, Pierre Yves; Julliard, Romain; Gruber, Bernd; Clobert, Jean; Dziock, Frank; Lengyel, S.; Nowicki, Piotr; DÉri, Eszter; Budrys, Eduardas; Kull, Tiiu; Tali, Kadri; Bauch, Bianca; Settele, Josef; Van Swaay, Chris; Kobler, Andrej; Babij, Valerija; Papastergiadou, Eva; Henle, Klaus.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 307-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schmeller, DS, Henry, PY, Julliard, R, Gruber, B, Clobert, J, Dziock, F, Lengyel, S, Nowicki, P, DÉri, E, Budrys, E, Kull, T, Tali, K, Bauch, B, Settele, J, Van Swaay, C, Kobler, A, Babij, V, Papastergiadou, E & Henle, K 2009, 'Ventajas del monitoreo de biodiversidad basado en voluntarios en Europa', Conservation Biology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x
Schmeller DS, Henry PY, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clobert J, Dziock F et al. Ventajas del monitoreo de biodiversidad basado en voluntarios en Europa. Conservation Biology. 2009 Apr;23(2):307-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x
Schmeller, Dirk S. ; Henry, Pierre Yves ; Julliard, Romain ; Gruber, Bernd ; Clobert, Jean ; Dziock, Frank ; Lengyel, S. ; Nowicki, Piotr ; DÉri, Eszter ; Budrys, Eduardas ; Kull, Tiiu ; Tali, Kadri ; Bauch, Bianca ; Settele, Josef ; Van Swaay, Chris ; Kobler, Andrej ; Babij, Valerija ; Papastergiadou, Eva ; Henle, Klaus. / Ventajas del monitoreo de biodiversidad basado en voluntarios en Europa. In: Conservation Biology. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 307-316.
@article{ac4febe12c394b4a9e00f4c189de6ab9,
title = "Ventajas del monitoreo de biodiversidad basado en voluntarios en Europa",
abstract = "Without robust and unbiased systems for monitoring, changes in natural systems will remain enigmatic for policy makers, leaving them without a clear idea of the consequences of any environmental policies they might adopt. Generally, biodiversity-monitoring activities are not integrated or evaluated across any large geographic region. The EuMon project conducted the first large-scale evaluation of monitoring practices in Europe through an on-line questionnaire and is reporting on the results of this survey. In September 2007 the EuMon project had documented 395 monitoring schemes for species, which represents a total annual cost of about €4 million, involving more than 46,000 persons devoting over 148,000 person-days-year to biodiversity-monitoring activities. Here we focused on the analysis of variations of monitoring practices across a set of taxonomic groups (birds, amphibians and reptiles, mammals, butterflies, plants, and other insects) and across 5 European countries (France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, and Poland). Our results suggest that the overall sampling effort of a scheme is linked with the proportion of volunteers involved in that scheme. Because precision is a function of the number of monitored sites and the number of sites is maximized by volunteer involvement, our results do not support the common belief that volunteer-based schemes are too noisy to be informative. Just the opposite, we believe volunteer-based schemes provide relatively reliable data, with state-of-the-art survey designs or data-analysis methods, and consequently can yield unbiased results. Quality of data collected by volunteers is more likely determined by survey design, analytical methodology, and communication skills within the schemes rather than by volunteer involvement per se.",
keywords = "Biodiversity monitoring, Costs, Data collection, Sampling effort, Volunteer involvement",
author = "Schmeller, {Dirk S.} and Henry, {Pierre Yves} and Romain Julliard and Bernd Gruber and Jean Clobert and Frank Dziock and S. Lengyel and Piotr Nowicki and Eszter D{\'E}ri and Eduardas Budrys and Tiiu Kull and Kadri Tali and Bianca Bauch and Josef Settele and {Van Swaay}, Chris and Andrej Kobler and Valerija Babij and Eva Papastergiadou and Klaus Henle",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "23",
pages = "307--316",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ventajas del monitoreo de biodiversidad basado en voluntarios en Europa

AU - Schmeller, Dirk S.

AU - Henry, Pierre Yves

AU - Julliard, Romain

AU - Gruber, Bernd

AU - Clobert, Jean

AU - Dziock, Frank

AU - Lengyel, S.

AU - Nowicki, Piotr

AU - DÉri, Eszter

AU - Budrys, Eduardas

AU - Kull, Tiiu

AU - Tali, Kadri

AU - Bauch, Bianca

AU - Settele, Josef

AU - Van Swaay, Chris

AU - Kobler, Andrej

AU - Babij, Valerija

AU - Papastergiadou, Eva

AU - Henle, Klaus

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Without robust and unbiased systems for monitoring, changes in natural systems will remain enigmatic for policy makers, leaving them without a clear idea of the consequences of any environmental policies they might adopt. Generally, biodiversity-monitoring activities are not integrated or evaluated across any large geographic region. The EuMon project conducted the first large-scale evaluation of monitoring practices in Europe through an on-line questionnaire and is reporting on the results of this survey. In September 2007 the EuMon project had documented 395 monitoring schemes for species, which represents a total annual cost of about €4 million, involving more than 46,000 persons devoting over 148,000 person-days-year to biodiversity-monitoring activities. Here we focused on the analysis of variations of monitoring practices across a set of taxonomic groups (birds, amphibians and reptiles, mammals, butterflies, plants, and other insects) and across 5 European countries (France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, and Poland). Our results suggest that the overall sampling effort of a scheme is linked with the proportion of volunteers involved in that scheme. Because precision is a function of the number of monitored sites and the number of sites is maximized by volunteer involvement, our results do not support the common belief that volunteer-based schemes are too noisy to be informative. Just the opposite, we believe volunteer-based schemes provide relatively reliable data, with state-of-the-art survey designs or data-analysis methods, and consequently can yield unbiased results. Quality of data collected by volunteers is more likely determined by survey design, analytical methodology, and communication skills within the schemes rather than by volunteer involvement per se.

AB - Without robust and unbiased systems for monitoring, changes in natural systems will remain enigmatic for policy makers, leaving them without a clear idea of the consequences of any environmental policies they might adopt. Generally, biodiversity-monitoring activities are not integrated or evaluated across any large geographic region. The EuMon project conducted the first large-scale evaluation of monitoring practices in Europe through an on-line questionnaire and is reporting on the results of this survey. In September 2007 the EuMon project had documented 395 monitoring schemes for species, which represents a total annual cost of about €4 million, involving more than 46,000 persons devoting over 148,000 person-days-year to biodiversity-monitoring activities. Here we focused on the analysis of variations of monitoring practices across a set of taxonomic groups (birds, amphibians and reptiles, mammals, butterflies, plants, and other insects) and across 5 European countries (France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, and Poland). Our results suggest that the overall sampling effort of a scheme is linked with the proportion of volunteers involved in that scheme. Because precision is a function of the number of monitored sites and the number of sites is maximized by volunteer involvement, our results do not support the common belief that volunteer-based schemes are too noisy to be informative. Just the opposite, we believe volunteer-based schemes provide relatively reliable data, with state-of-the-art survey designs or data-analysis methods, and consequently can yield unbiased results. Quality of data collected by volunteers is more likely determined by survey design, analytical methodology, and communication skills within the schemes rather than by volunteer involvement per se.

KW - Biodiversity monitoring

KW - Costs

KW - Data collection

KW - Sampling effort

KW - Volunteer involvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62549122888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62549122888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 307

EP - 316

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 2

ER -