Accuracy of Coupled Cluster Excited State Potential Energy Surfaces

A. Tajti, John F. Stanton, Devin A. Matthews, Péter G. Szalay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The validation of the quality of the description of excited electronic states is of special importance in quantum chemistry as the general reliability of ab initio methods shows a much larger variation for these states than for the ground state. In this study, we investigate the quality of excited state energy gradients and potential energy surfaces on selected systems, as provided by the single reference coupled cluster variants CC2, CCSD, CCSD(T)(a)∗, and CC3. Gradients and surface plots that follow the Franck-Condon forces are compared to the respective CCSDT reference values, thereby establishing a useful strategy for judging each variant's accuracy. The results reveal serious flaws of lower order methods - in particular, CC2 - in several situations where they otherwise give accurate vertical excitation energies, as well as excellent accuracy and consistency of the recently proposed CCSD(T)(a)∗ method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5859-5869
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 13 2018

Fingerprint

Quantum chemistry
Potential energy surfaces
Excitation energy
Electronic states
Excited states
Ground state
potential energy
Defects
excitation
gradients
quantum chemistry
energy
plots
ground state
defects
electronics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

Accuracy of Coupled Cluster Excited State Potential Energy Surfaces. / Tajti, A.; Stanton, John F.; Matthews, Devin A.; Szalay, Péter G.

In: Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Vol. 14, No. 11, 13.11.2018, p. 5859-5869.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tajti, A. ; Stanton, John F. ; Matthews, Devin A. ; Szalay, Péter G. / Accuracy of Coupled Cluster Excited State Potential Energy Surfaces. In: Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2018 ; Vol. 14, No. 11. pp. 5859-5869.
@article{c6883362140949d393f0511b0d9afdf3,
title = "Accuracy of Coupled Cluster Excited State Potential Energy Surfaces",
abstract = "The validation of the quality of the description of excited electronic states is of special importance in quantum chemistry as the general reliability of ab initio methods shows a much larger variation for these states than for the ground state. In this study, we investigate the quality of excited state energy gradients and potential energy surfaces on selected systems, as provided by the single reference coupled cluster variants CC2, CCSD, CCSD(T)(a)∗, and CC3. Gradients and surface plots that follow the Franck-Condon forces are compared to the respective CCSDT reference values, thereby establishing a useful strategy for judging each variant's accuracy. The results reveal serious flaws of lower order methods - in particular, CC2 - in several situations where they otherwise give accurate vertical excitation energies, as well as excellent accuracy and consistency of the recently proposed CCSD(T)(a)∗ method.",
author = "A. Tajti and Stanton, {John F.} and Matthews, {Devin A.} and Szalay, {P{\'e}ter G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00681",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "5859--5869",
journal = "Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation",
issn = "1549-9618",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of Coupled Cluster Excited State Potential Energy Surfaces

AU - Tajti, A.

AU - Stanton, John F.

AU - Matthews, Devin A.

AU - Szalay, Péter G.

PY - 2018/11/13

Y1 - 2018/11/13

N2 - The validation of the quality of the description of excited electronic states is of special importance in quantum chemistry as the general reliability of ab initio methods shows a much larger variation for these states than for the ground state. In this study, we investigate the quality of excited state energy gradients and potential energy surfaces on selected systems, as provided by the single reference coupled cluster variants CC2, CCSD, CCSD(T)(a)∗, and CC3. Gradients and surface plots that follow the Franck-Condon forces are compared to the respective CCSDT reference values, thereby establishing a useful strategy for judging each variant's accuracy. The results reveal serious flaws of lower order methods - in particular, CC2 - in several situations where they otherwise give accurate vertical excitation energies, as well as excellent accuracy and consistency of the recently proposed CCSD(T)(a)∗ method.

AB - The validation of the quality of the description of excited electronic states is of special importance in quantum chemistry as the general reliability of ab initio methods shows a much larger variation for these states than for the ground state. In this study, we investigate the quality of excited state energy gradients and potential energy surfaces on selected systems, as provided by the single reference coupled cluster variants CC2, CCSD, CCSD(T)(a)∗, and CC3. Gradients and surface plots that follow the Franck-Condon forces are compared to the respective CCSDT reference values, thereby establishing a useful strategy for judging each variant's accuracy. The results reveal serious flaws of lower order methods - in particular, CC2 - in several situations where they otherwise give accurate vertical excitation energies, as well as excellent accuracy and consistency of the recently proposed CCSD(T)(a)∗ method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056297191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056297191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00681

DO - 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00681

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 5859

EP - 5869

JO - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

JF - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

SN - 1549-9618

IS - 11

ER -