A systematic comparison of different techniques to determine the zeta potential of silica nanoparticles in biological medium

Aneta Sikora, Dorota Bartczak, Daniel Geißler, Vikram Kestens, Gert Roebben, Yannic Ramaye, Z. Varga, Marcell Palmai, Alexander G. Shard, Heidi Goenaga-Infante, Caterina Minelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The surface charge density of nanoparticles plays an important role in the way they interact with biological systems. The ability to measure the surface charge density of nanoparticles in biological media is therefore of importance in understanding the magnitude of such interactions. There are a number of methods which may be used to assess surface charge density through the measurement of electrophoretic mobility. In order to better understand the comparability of these methods, the ζ-potential of silica nanoparticles in water, buffer and serum-based biological medium was measured by one ensemble and two particle-by-particle techniques: electrophoretic light scattering (ELS), tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) and zeta particle tracking analysis (z-PTA). To allow the comparability of results from different techniques, test samples were prepared according to an established protocol, although some variations were necessary to meet specific instrument requirements. Here we compare, for the first time, measurement results from the different techniques and discuss how modifications related to parameters such as environmental pH, dilution factor and presence of biomolecules influence the charge measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9835-9843
Number of pages9
JournalAnalytical Methods
Volume7
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 7 2015

Fingerprint

Zeta potential
Surface charge
Charge density
Silicon Dioxide
Silica
Nanoparticles
Electrophoretic mobility
Biomolecules
Biological systems
Time measurement
Light scattering
Dilution
Buffers
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Engineering(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

Sikora, A., Bartczak, D., Geißler, D., Kestens, V., Roebben, G., Ramaye, Y., ... Minelli, C. (2015). A systematic comparison of different techniques to determine the zeta potential of silica nanoparticles in biological medium. Analytical Methods, 7(23), 9835-9843. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ay02014j

A systematic comparison of different techniques to determine the zeta potential of silica nanoparticles in biological medium. / Sikora, Aneta; Bartczak, Dorota; Geißler, Daniel; Kestens, Vikram; Roebben, Gert; Ramaye, Yannic; Varga, Z.; Palmai, Marcell; Shard, Alexander G.; Goenaga-Infante, Heidi; Minelli, Caterina.

In: Analytical Methods, Vol. 7, No. 23, 07.12.2015, p. 9835-9843.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sikora, A, Bartczak, D, Geißler, D, Kestens, V, Roebben, G, Ramaye, Y, Varga, Z, Palmai, M, Shard, AG, Goenaga-Infante, H & Minelli, C 2015, 'A systematic comparison of different techniques to determine the zeta potential of silica nanoparticles in biological medium', Analytical Methods, vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 9835-9843. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ay02014j
Sikora, Aneta ; Bartczak, Dorota ; Geißler, Daniel ; Kestens, Vikram ; Roebben, Gert ; Ramaye, Yannic ; Varga, Z. ; Palmai, Marcell ; Shard, Alexander G. ; Goenaga-Infante, Heidi ; Minelli, Caterina. / A systematic comparison of different techniques to determine the zeta potential of silica nanoparticles in biological medium. In: Analytical Methods. 2015 ; Vol. 7, No. 23. pp. 9835-9843.
@article{c31b79087ef24cedb7e074350edd32ae,
title = "A systematic comparison of different techniques to determine the zeta potential of silica nanoparticles in biological medium",
abstract = "The surface charge density of nanoparticles plays an important role in the way they interact with biological systems. The ability to measure the surface charge density of nanoparticles in biological media is therefore of importance in understanding the magnitude of such interactions. There are a number of methods which may be used to assess surface charge density through the measurement of electrophoretic mobility. In order to better understand the comparability of these methods, the ζ-potential of silica nanoparticles in water, buffer and serum-based biological medium was measured by one ensemble and two particle-by-particle techniques: electrophoretic light scattering (ELS), tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) and zeta particle tracking analysis (z-PTA). To allow the comparability of results from different techniques, test samples were prepared according to an established protocol, although some variations were necessary to meet specific instrument requirements. Here we compare, for the first time, measurement results from the different techniques and discuss how modifications related to parameters such as environmental pH, dilution factor and presence of biomolecules influence the charge measurements.",
author = "Aneta Sikora and Dorota Bartczak and Daniel Gei{\ss}ler and Vikram Kestens and Gert Roebben and Yannic Ramaye and Z. Varga and Marcell Palmai and Shard, {Alexander G.} and Heidi Goenaga-Infante and Caterina Minelli",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1039/c5ay02014j",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "9835--9843",
journal = "Analytical Methods",
issn = "1759-9660",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic comparison of different techniques to determine the zeta potential of silica nanoparticles in biological medium

AU - Sikora, Aneta

AU - Bartczak, Dorota

AU - Geißler, Daniel

AU - Kestens, Vikram

AU - Roebben, Gert

AU - Ramaye, Yannic

AU - Varga, Z.

AU - Palmai, Marcell

AU - Shard, Alexander G.

AU - Goenaga-Infante, Heidi

AU - Minelli, Caterina

PY - 2015/12/7

Y1 - 2015/12/7

N2 - The surface charge density of nanoparticles plays an important role in the way they interact with biological systems. The ability to measure the surface charge density of nanoparticles in biological media is therefore of importance in understanding the magnitude of such interactions. There are a number of methods which may be used to assess surface charge density through the measurement of electrophoretic mobility. In order to better understand the comparability of these methods, the ζ-potential of silica nanoparticles in water, buffer and serum-based biological medium was measured by one ensemble and two particle-by-particle techniques: electrophoretic light scattering (ELS), tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) and zeta particle tracking analysis (z-PTA). To allow the comparability of results from different techniques, test samples were prepared according to an established protocol, although some variations were necessary to meet specific instrument requirements. Here we compare, for the first time, measurement results from the different techniques and discuss how modifications related to parameters such as environmental pH, dilution factor and presence of biomolecules influence the charge measurements.

AB - The surface charge density of nanoparticles plays an important role in the way they interact with biological systems. The ability to measure the surface charge density of nanoparticles in biological media is therefore of importance in understanding the magnitude of such interactions. There are a number of methods which may be used to assess surface charge density through the measurement of electrophoretic mobility. In order to better understand the comparability of these methods, the ζ-potential of silica nanoparticles in water, buffer and serum-based biological medium was measured by one ensemble and two particle-by-particle techniques: electrophoretic light scattering (ELS), tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) and zeta particle tracking analysis (z-PTA). To allow the comparability of results from different techniques, test samples were prepared according to an established protocol, although some variations were necessary to meet specific instrument requirements. Here we compare, for the first time, measurement results from the different techniques and discuss how modifications related to parameters such as environmental pH, dilution factor and presence of biomolecules influence the charge measurements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947902838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947902838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c5ay02014j

DO - 10.1039/c5ay02014j

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 9835

EP - 9843

JO - Analytical Methods

JF - Analytical Methods

SN - 1759-9660

IS - 23

ER -