A new generation of relational charts for comparative assessment of citation impact

W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Bart Thijs, Koenraad Debackere

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A common problem in comparative bibliometric studies at the meso and micro level is the differentiation and specialization of research profiles of the objects of analysis at lower levels of aggregation. In this study, institutional profile clusters are used to examine which level of the hierarchical subject classification should preferably be used to build subject-normalized citation indicators. It is shown that a set of properly normalized indicators can serve as a basis of comparative assessment within and even among different clusters, provided that their profiles still overlap and such comparison is thus meaningful. Using the example of 24 European universities, a new version of relational charts is presented for the comparative assessment of citation impact.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-379
Number of pages7
JournalArchivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
Volume56
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Bibliometrics
Research

Keywords

  • Citation analysis
  • Relational charts
  • Scientometric indicators
  • Subject normalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

A new generation of relational charts for comparative assessment of citation impact. / Glänzel, W.; Schubert, A.; Thijs, Bart; Debackere, Koenraad.

In: Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, Vol. 56, No. 6, 12.2008, p. 373-379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99acab15378941d3bb10ad793da50b8d,
title = "A new generation of relational charts for comparative assessment of citation impact",
abstract = "A common problem in comparative bibliometric studies at the meso and micro level is the differentiation and specialization of research profiles of the objects of analysis at lower levels of aggregation. In this study, institutional profile clusters are used to examine which level of the hierarchical subject classification should preferably be used to build subject-normalized citation indicators. It is shown that a set of properly normalized indicators can serve as a basis of comparative assessment within and even among different clusters, provided that their profiles still overlap and such comparison is thus meaningful. Using the example of 24 European universities, a new version of relational charts is presented for the comparative assessment of citation impact.",
keywords = "Citation analysis, Relational charts, Scientometric indicators, Subject normalization",
author = "W. Gl{\"a}nzel and A. Schubert and Bart Thijs and Koenraad Debackere",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00005-008-0040-3",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "373--379",
journal = "Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis",
issn = "0004-069X",
publisher = "Birkhauser Verlag Basel",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new generation of relational charts for comparative assessment of citation impact

AU - Glänzel, W.

AU - Schubert, A.

AU - Thijs, Bart

AU - Debackere, Koenraad

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - A common problem in comparative bibliometric studies at the meso and micro level is the differentiation and specialization of research profiles of the objects of analysis at lower levels of aggregation. In this study, institutional profile clusters are used to examine which level of the hierarchical subject classification should preferably be used to build subject-normalized citation indicators. It is shown that a set of properly normalized indicators can serve as a basis of comparative assessment within and even among different clusters, provided that their profiles still overlap and such comparison is thus meaningful. Using the example of 24 European universities, a new version of relational charts is presented for the comparative assessment of citation impact.

AB - A common problem in comparative bibliometric studies at the meso and micro level is the differentiation and specialization of research profiles of the objects of analysis at lower levels of aggregation. In this study, institutional profile clusters are used to examine which level of the hierarchical subject classification should preferably be used to build subject-normalized citation indicators. It is shown that a set of properly normalized indicators can serve as a basis of comparative assessment within and even among different clusters, provided that their profiles still overlap and such comparison is thus meaningful. Using the example of 24 European universities, a new version of relational charts is presented for the comparative assessment of citation impact.

KW - Citation analysis

KW - Relational charts

KW - Scientometric indicators

KW - Subject normalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58549084560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58549084560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00005-008-0040-3

DO - 10.1007/s00005-008-0040-3

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 373

EP - 379

JO - Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis

JF - Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis

SN - 0004-069X

IS - 6

ER -