A measure for assessing functional diversity in ecological communities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Functional diversity is regarded as a key in understanding the link between ecosystem function and biodiversity, but its measurement is rather problematic. The two widely used continuous measures are the dendrogram-based measure (DBM) and the functional attribute diversity (FAD). In contrast to DBM, FAD does not require the knowledge of the entire species pool before the analysis, and hence FAD is a more ideal tool for measuring functional diversity. However, the original form of FAD and its variants have several undesirable properties. Here, we suggest a modified FAD (denoted by MFAD), which-as illustrated by artificial and actual data sets-allows calculating functional diversity without violating the twinning and monotonicity criteria such that the number of species collected is compensated for. These requirements are met by replacing the original species by so-called functional species and then by dividing FAD by the number of functional units. Accordingly, MFAD measures the dispersion of species in the functional traits space so that MFAD values for different communities can directly be compared if the same set of functional traits is used. Finally, using data of two freshwater communities (caddisfly and riverine fish), we evaluate the change of species richness and functional diversity in relation to sampling effort (sample unit size). We found that functional diversity is a better and more reliable community descriptor than species richness in a sense that it converges to the maximum faster in the function of sampling effort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-167
Number of pages11
JournalAquatic Ecology
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

functional diversity
species diversity
species richness
Trichoptera
caddisfly
species pool
twinning
sampling
ecosystem function
attribute
ecological community
biodiversity
ecosystems
fish

Keywords

  • Fish
  • Functional attribute diversity
  • Species traits
  • Trichoptera
  • Unique functional unit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

A measure for assessing functional diversity in ecological communities. / Schmera, D.; Erős, T.; Podaní, J.

In: Aquatic Ecology, Vol. 43, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 157-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25bb7345a9cf4e2595c9a9e1b7e8891a,
title = "A measure for assessing functional diversity in ecological communities",
abstract = "Functional diversity is regarded as a key in understanding the link between ecosystem function and biodiversity, but its measurement is rather problematic. The two widely used continuous measures are the dendrogram-based measure (DBM) and the functional attribute diversity (FAD). In contrast to DBM, FAD does not require the knowledge of the entire species pool before the analysis, and hence FAD is a more ideal tool for measuring functional diversity. However, the original form of FAD and its variants have several undesirable properties. Here, we suggest a modified FAD (denoted by MFAD), which-as illustrated by artificial and actual data sets-allows calculating functional diversity without violating the twinning and monotonicity criteria such that the number of species collected is compensated for. These requirements are met by replacing the original species by so-called functional species and then by dividing FAD by the number of functional units. Accordingly, MFAD measures the dispersion of species in the functional traits space so that MFAD values for different communities can directly be compared if the same set of functional traits is used. Finally, using data of two freshwater communities (caddisfly and riverine fish), we evaluate the change of species richness and functional diversity in relation to sampling effort (sample unit size). We found that functional diversity is a better and more reliable community descriptor than species richness in a sense that it converges to the maximum faster in the function of sampling effort.",
keywords = "Fish, Functional attribute diversity, Species traits, Trichoptera, Unique functional unit",
author = "D. Schmera and T. Erős and J. Podan{\'i}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10452-007-9152-9",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "157--167",
journal = "Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology",
issn = "1380-8427",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A measure for assessing functional diversity in ecological communities

AU - Schmera, D.

AU - Erős, T.

AU - Podaní, J.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Functional diversity is regarded as a key in understanding the link between ecosystem function and biodiversity, but its measurement is rather problematic. The two widely used continuous measures are the dendrogram-based measure (DBM) and the functional attribute diversity (FAD). In contrast to DBM, FAD does not require the knowledge of the entire species pool before the analysis, and hence FAD is a more ideal tool for measuring functional diversity. However, the original form of FAD and its variants have several undesirable properties. Here, we suggest a modified FAD (denoted by MFAD), which-as illustrated by artificial and actual data sets-allows calculating functional diversity without violating the twinning and monotonicity criteria such that the number of species collected is compensated for. These requirements are met by replacing the original species by so-called functional species and then by dividing FAD by the number of functional units. Accordingly, MFAD measures the dispersion of species in the functional traits space so that MFAD values for different communities can directly be compared if the same set of functional traits is used. Finally, using data of two freshwater communities (caddisfly and riverine fish), we evaluate the change of species richness and functional diversity in relation to sampling effort (sample unit size). We found that functional diversity is a better and more reliable community descriptor than species richness in a sense that it converges to the maximum faster in the function of sampling effort.

AB - Functional diversity is regarded as a key in understanding the link between ecosystem function and biodiversity, but its measurement is rather problematic. The two widely used continuous measures are the dendrogram-based measure (DBM) and the functional attribute diversity (FAD). In contrast to DBM, FAD does not require the knowledge of the entire species pool before the analysis, and hence FAD is a more ideal tool for measuring functional diversity. However, the original form of FAD and its variants have several undesirable properties. Here, we suggest a modified FAD (denoted by MFAD), which-as illustrated by artificial and actual data sets-allows calculating functional diversity without violating the twinning and monotonicity criteria such that the number of species collected is compensated for. These requirements are met by replacing the original species by so-called functional species and then by dividing FAD by the number of functional units. Accordingly, MFAD measures the dispersion of species in the functional traits space so that MFAD values for different communities can directly be compared if the same set of functional traits is used. Finally, using data of two freshwater communities (caddisfly and riverine fish), we evaluate the change of species richness and functional diversity in relation to sampling effort (sample unit size). We found that functional diversity is a better and more reliable community descriptor than species richness in a sense that it converges to the maximum faster in the function of sampling effort.

KW - Fish

KW - Functional attribute diversity

KW - Species traits

KW - Trichoptera

KW - Unique functional unit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59849116235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59849116235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10452-007-9152-9

DO - 10.1007/s10452-007-9152-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:59849116235

VL - 43

SP - 157

EP - 167

JO - Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology

JF - Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology

SN - 1380-8427

IS - 1

ER -