A large European, multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale

Armida Mucci, Annarita Vignapiano, I. Bitter, Stephen F. Austin, Camille Delouche, Sonia Dollfus, Andreas Erfurth, W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker, Giulia M. Giordano, Igor Gladyshev, Birte Glenthøj, Karoline Gütter, Alex Hofer, Jan Hubeňák, Stefan Kaiser, Jan Libiger, Ingrid Melle, Mette Nielsen, Oleg Papsuev, Janusz K. RybakowskiGabriele Sachs, Alp Üçok, Pawel Wojciak, Silvana Galderisi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Negative symptoms represent an unmet need of treatment in schizophrenia. Although a consensus exists on negative symptom construct, and second generation assessment instruments reflecting the consensus are available, studies still rely upon old assessment instruments, that do not reflect recent conceptualizations and might limit progress in the search for effective treatments. This is often the case in the European context, where one of the challenges encountered in designing large studies is the availability of validated instruments in the many languages of the continent. To address this challenge and promote sound research on negative symptoms in Europe, the ECNP Schizophrenia Network coordinated a large multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). Clinically-stable subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ, N = 249) were recruited from 10 European Countries. Apart from BNSS, subjects were administered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and standardized instruments for depression, extrapyramidal symptoms and psychosocial functioning. Results showed an excellent internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of BNSS and replicated a 5 factor-model. A larger number of subjects with predominant negative symptoms, i.e. the target population for clinical trials, was identified by using the BNSS compared to the PANSS. Regression analysis showed that BNSS-avolition, a key negative symptom poorly assessed by PANSS, explained 23.9% of psychosocial functioning, while no combination of the PANSS core negative symptoms showed the same impact on functioning. The study demonstrated that BNSS has substantial advantages with respect to PANSS for the identification of the avolition domain and subjects with predominant negative symptoms.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Validation Studies
Schizophrenia
Consensus
Health Services Needs and Demand
Language
Regression Analysis
Clinical Trials
Depression
Therapeutics
Research

Keywords

  • Avolition
  • BNSS
  • Functional outcome
  • Negative symptoms
  • PANSS-negative subscale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

A large European, multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale. / Mucci, Armida; Vignapiano, Annarita; Bitter, I.; Austin, Stephen F.; Delouche, Camille; Dollfus, Sonia; Erfurth, Andreas; Fleischhacker, W. Wolfgang; Giordano, Giulia M.; Gladyshev, Igor; Glenthøj, Birte; Gütter, Karoline; Hofer, Alex; Hubeňák, Jan; Kaiser, Stefan; Libiger, Jan; Melle, Ingrid; Nielsen, Mette; Papsuev, Oleg; Rybakowski, Janusz K.; Sachs, Gabriele; Üçok, Alp; Wojciak, Pawel; Galderisi, Silvana.

In: European Neuropsychopharmacology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mucci, A, Vignapiano, A, Bitter, I, Austin, SF, Delouche, C, Dollfus, S, Erfurth, A, Fleischhacker, WW, Giordano, GM, Gladyshev, I, Glenthøj, B, Gütter, K, Hofer, A, Hubeňák, J, Kaiser, S, Libiger, J, Melle, I, Nielsen, M, Papsuev, O, Rybakowski, JK, Sachs, G, Üçok, A, Wojciak, P & Galderisi, S 2019, 'A large European, multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale', European Neuropsychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.05.006
Mucci, Armida ; Vignapiano, Annarita ; Bitter, I. ; Austin, Stephen F. ; Delouche, Camille ; Dollfus, Sonia ; Erfurth, Andreas ; Fleischhacker, W. Wolfgang ; Giordano, Giulia M. ; Gladyshev, Igor ; Glenthøj, Birte ; Gütter, Karoline ; Hofer, Alex ; Hubeňák, Jan ; Kaiser, Stefan ; Libiger, Jan ; Melle, Ingrid ; Nielsen, Mette ; Papsuev, Oleg ; Rybakowski, Janusz K. ; Sachs, Gabriele ; Üçok, Alp ; Wojciak, Pawel ; Galderisi, Silvana. / A large European, multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale. In: European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019.
@article{f9d2aa7cfb1a478fb6ebed641ff06d15,
title = "A large European, multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale",
abstract = "Negative symptoms represent an unmet need of treatment in schizophrenia. Although a consensus exists on negative symptom construct, and second generation assessment instruments reflecting the consensus are available, studies still rely upon old assessment instruments, that do not reflect recent conceptualizations and might limit progress in the search for effective treatments. This is often the case in the European context, where one of the challenges encountered in designing large studies is the availability of validated instruments in the many languages of the continent. To address this challenge and promote sound research on negative symptoms in Europe, the ECNP Schizophrenia Network coordinated a large multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). Clinically-stable subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ, N = 249) were recruited from 10 European Countries. Apart from BNSS, subjects were administered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and standardized instruments for depression, extrapyramidal symptoms and psychosocial functioning. Results showed an excellent internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of BNSS and replicated a 5 factor-model. A larger number of subjects with predominant negative symptoms, i.e. the target population for clinical trials, was identified by using the BNSS compared to the PANSS. Regression analysis showed that BNSS-avolition, a key negative symptom poorly assessed by PANSS, explained 23.9{\%} of psychosocial functioning, while no combination of the PANSS core negative symptoms showed the same impact on functioning. The study demonstrated that BNSS has substantial advantages with respect to PANSS for the identification of the avolition domain and subjects with predominant negative symptoms.",
keywords = "Avolition, BNSS, Functional outcome, Negative symptoms, PANSS-negative subscale",
author = "Armida Mucci and Annarita Vignapiano and I. Bitter and Austin, {Stephen F.} and Camille Delouche and Sonia Dollfus and Andreas Erfurth and Fleischhacker, {W. Wolfgang} and Giordano, {Giulia M.} and Igor Gladyshev and Birte Glenth{\o}j and Karoline G{\"u}tter and Alex Hofer and Jan Hubeň{\'a}k and Stefan Kaiser and Jan Libiger and Ingrid Melle and Mette Nielsen and Oleg Papsuev and Rybakowski, {Janusz K.} and Gabriele Sachs and Alp {\"U}{\cc}ok and Pawel Wojciak and Silvana Galderisi",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.05.006",
language = "English",
journal = "European Neuropsychopharmacology",
issn = "0924-977X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A large European, multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale

AU - Mucci, Armida

AU - Vignapiano, Annarita

AU - Bitter, I.

AU - Austin, Stephen F.

AU - Delouche, Camille

AU - Dollfus, Sonia

AU - Erfurth, Andreas

AU - Fleischhacker, W. Wolfgang

AU - Giordano, Giulia M.

AU - Gladyshev, Igor

AU - Glenthøj, Birte

AU - Gütter, Karoline

AU - Hofer, Alex

AU - Hubeňák, Jan

AU - Kaiser, Stefan

AU - Libiger, Jan

AU - Melle, Ingrid

AU - Nielsen, Mette

AU - Papsuev, Oleg

AU - Rybakowski, Janusz K.

AU - Sachs, Gabriele

AU - Üçok, Alp

AU - Wojciak, Pawel

AU - Galderisi, Silvana

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Negative symptoms represent an unmet need of treatment in schizophrenia. Although a consensus exists on negative symptom construct, and second generation assessment instruments reflecting the consensus are available, studies still rely upon old assessment instruments, that do not reflect recent conceptualizations and might limit progress in the search for effective treatments. This is often the case in the European context, where one of the challenges encountered in designing large studies is the availability of validated instruments in the many languages of the continent. To address this challenge and promote sound research on negative symptoms in Europe, the ECNP Schizophrenia Network coordinated a large multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). Clinically-stable subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ, N = 249) were recruited from 10 European Countries. Apart from BNSS, subjects were administered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and standardized instruments for depression, extrapyramidal symptoms and psychosocial functioning. Results showed an excellent internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of BNSS and replicated a 5 factor-model. A larger number of subjects with predominant negative symptoms, i.e. the target population for clinical trials, was identified by using the BNSS compared to the PANSS. Regression analysis showed that BNSS-avolition, a key negative symptom poorly assessed by PANSS, explained 23.9% of psychosocial functioning, while no combination of the PANSS core negative symptoms showed the same impact on functioning. The study demonstrated that BNSS has substantial advantages with respect to PANSS for the identification of the avolition domain and subjects with predominant negative symptoms.

AB - Negative symptoms represent an unmet need of treatment in schizophrenia. Although a consensus exists on negative symptom construct, and second generation assessment instruments reflecting the consensus are available, studies still rely upon old assessment instruments, that do not reflect recent conceptualizations and might limit progress in the search for effective treatments. This is often the case in the European context, where one of the challenges encountered in designing large studies is the availability of validated instruments in the many languages of the continent. To address this challenge and promote sound research on negative symptoms in Europe, the ECNP Schizophrenia Network coordinated a large multicenter, multinational validation study of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS). Clinically-stable subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ, N = 249) were recruited from 10 European Countries. Apart from BNSS, subjects were administered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and standardized instruments for depression, extrapyramidal symptoms and psychosocial functioning. Results showed an excellent internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of BNSS and replicated a 5 factor-model. A larger number of subjects with predominant negative symptoms, i.e. the target population for clinical trials, was identified by using the BNSS compared to the PANSS. Regression analysis showed that BNSS-avolition, a key negative symptom poorly assessed by PANSS, explained 23.9% of psychosocial functioning, while no combination of the PANSS core negative symptoms showed the same impact on functioning. The study demonstrated that BNSS has substantial advantages with respect to PANSS for the identification of the avolition domain and subjects with predominant negative symptoms.

KW - Avolition

KW - BNSS

KW - Functional outcome

KW - Negative symptoms

KW - PANSS-negative subscale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067890001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067890001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.05.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067890001

JO - European Neuropsychopharmacology

JF - European Neuropsychopharmacology

SN - 0924-977X

ER -