A critical assessment of methods for the intrinsic analysis of liquid interfaces: 2. Density profiles

Miguel Jorge, György Hantal, P. Jedlovszky, M. Natália D S Cordeiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Substantial improvements in the molecular level understanding of fluid interfaces have recently been achieved by recognizing the importance of detecting the intrinsic surface of the coexisting condensed phases in computer simulations (i.e., after the removal of corrugations caused by capillary waves) and by developing several methods for identifying the molecules that are indeed located at the boundary of the two phases. In our previous paper [J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 11169], we critically compared those methods in terms of reliability, robustness, and computation speed. Once the intrinsic surface of a given phase is detected, various profiles, such as the density profiles of the components, can be calculated relative to this intrinsic surface rather than to the macroscopically planar Gibbs dividing surface. As a continuation of our previous study, here we present a detailed and critical comparison of various methods that can be used to calculate intrinsic density profiles once the full set of truly interfacial molecules has been identified. Two of the methods, the Fourier function and the Voronoi tessellation, are already described in the literature; two other methods, the covering surface and the triangular interpolation, are newly proposed algorithms; one method, the modified grid-based intrinsic profile (GIP) method, is an improvement over an existing procedure. The different methods are again compared in terms of accuracy and computational cost. On the basis of this comparison, we propose a fast and accurate protocol to be routinely used for intrinsic surface analyses in computer simulations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18656-18663
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry C
Volume114
Issue number43
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 4 2010

Fingerprint

Liquids
liquids
profiles
computerized simulation
Molecules
capillary waves
Computer simulation
interpolation
molecules
Interpolation
coverings
grids
costs
Fluids
fluids
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films
  • Energy(all)

Cite this

A critical assessment of methods for the intrinsic analysis of liquid interfaces : 2. Density profiles. / Jorge, Miguel; Hantal, György; Jedlovszky, P.; Cordeiro, M. Natália D S.

In: Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Vol. 114, No. 43, 04.11.2010, p. 18656-18663.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jorge, Miguel ; Hantal, György ; Jedlovszky, P. ; Cordeiro, M. Natália D S. / A critical assessment of methods for the intrinsic analysis of liquid interfaces : 2. Density profiles. In: Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010 ; Vol. 114, No. 43. pp. 18656-18663.
@article{88406ecb4d264e5caee9dad39341fd52,
title = "A critical assessment of methods for the intrinsic analysis of liquid interfaces: 2. Density profiles",
abstract = "Substantial improvements in the molecular level understanding of fluid interfaces have recently been achieved by recognizing the importance of detecting the intrinsic surface of the coexisting condensed phases in computer simulations (i.e., after the removal of corrugations caused by capillary waves) and by developing several methods for identifying the molecules that are indeed located at the boundary of the two phases. In our previous paper [J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 11169], we critically compared those methods in terms of reliability, robustness, and computation speed. Once the intrinsic surface of a given phase is detected, various profiles, such as the density profiles of the components, can be calculated relative to this intrinsic surface rather than to the macroscopically planar Gibbs dividing surface. As a continuation of our previous study, here we present a detailed and critical comparison of various methods that can be used to calculate intrinsic density profiles once the full set of truly interfacial molecules has been identified. Two of the methods, the Fourier function and the Voronoi tessellation, are already described in the literature; two other methods, the covering surface and the triangular interpolation, are newly proposed algorithms; one method, the modified grid-based intrinsic profile (GIP) method, is an improvement over an existing procedure. The different methods are again compared in terms of accuracy and computational cost. On the basis of this comparison, we propose a fast and accurate protocol to be routinely used for intrinsic surface analyses in computer simulations.",
author = "Miguel Jorge and Gy{\"o}rgy Hantal and P. Jedlovszky and Cordeiro, {M. Nat{\'a}lia D S}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1021/jp107378s",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "18656--18663",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry C",
issn = "1932-7447",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "43",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical assessment of methods for the intrinsic analysis of liquid interfaces

T2 - 2. Density profiles

AU - Jorge, Miguel

AU - Hantal, György

AU - Jedlovszky, P.

AU - Cordeiro, M. Natália D S

PY - 2010/11/4

Y1 - 2010/11/4

N2 - Substantial improvements in the molecular level understanding of fluid interfaces have recently been achieved by recognizing the importance of detecting the intrinsic surface of the coexisting condensed phases in computer simulations (i.e., after the removal of corrugations caused by capillary waves) and by developing several methods for identifying the molecules that are indeed located at the boundary of the two phases. In our previous paper [J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 11169], we critically compared those methods in terms of reliability, robustness, and computation speed. Once the intrinsic surface of a given phase is detected, various profiles, such as the density profiles of the components, can be calculated relative to this intrinsic surface rather than to the macroscopically planar Gibbs dividing surface. As a continuation of our previous study, here we present a detailed and critical comparison of various methods that can be used to calculate intrinsic density profiles once the full set of truly interfacial molecules has been identified. Two of the methods, the Fourier function and the Voronoi tessellation, are already described in the literature; two other methods, the covering surface and the triangular interpolation, are newly proposed algorithms; one method, the modified grid-based intrinsic profile (GIP) method, is an improvement over an existing procedure. The different methods are again compared in terms of accuracy and computational cost. On the basis of this comparison, we propose a fast and accurate protocol to be routinely used for intrinsic surface analyses in computer simulations.

AB - Substantial improvements in the molecular level understanding of fluid interfaces have recently been achieved by recognizing the importance of detecting the intrinsic surface of the coexisting condensed phases in computer simulations (i.e., after the removal of corrugations caused by capillary waves) and by developing several methods for identifying the molecules that are indeed located at the boundary of the two phases. In our previous paper [J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 11169], we critically compared those methods in terms of reliability, robustness, and computation speed. Once the intrinsic surface of a given phase is detected, various profiles, such as the density profiles of the components, can be calculated relative to this intrinsic surface rather than to the macroscopically planar Gibbs dividing surface. As a continuation of our previous study, here we present a detailed and critical comparison of various methods that can be used to calculate intrinsic density profiles once the full set of truly interfacial molecules has been identified. Two of the methods, the Fourier function and the Voronoi tessellation, are already described in the literature; two other methods, the covering surface and the triangular interpolation, are newly proposed algorithms; one method, the modified grid-based intrinsic profile (GIP) method, is an improvement over an existing procedure. The different methods are again compared in terms of accuracy and computational cost. On the basis of this comparison, we propose a fast and accurate protocol to be routinely used for intrinsic surface analyses in computer simulations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650399141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650399141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/jp107378s

DO - 10.1021/jp107378s

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78650399141

VL - 114

SP - 18656

EP - 18663

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry C

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry C

SN - 1932-7447

IS - 43

ER -