A comparison of techniques for depth profiling oxygen in silicon

G. Mezey, E. Kótai, T. Nagy, L. Lohner, A. Manuba, Josef Gyulai, V. R. Deline, C. A. Evans, R. J. Blattner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Auger electron spectrometry (AES), Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (BS) and secondary ion mass spectrometry with Cs+ ion bombardment (Cs+/SIMS) have been experimentally compared as to their respective capabilities for depth profiling oxygen in silicon. This evaluation was conducted for depth profiling oxygen in silicon. This evaluation was conducted using standardized silicon samples with: (1) native (∼30 Å) and 80 Å thick surface oxides; (2) the same oxide layers buried beneath 1000 Å of evaporated amorphous silicon; (3) ion implanted oxygen in silicon. In general, BS was found to be the most quantitative of the three methods, particularly when using the 3.045 MeV 4He+ resonance technique for 16O in the channelling mode, but had the poorest detection limit (∼1020 atoms cm-3) and overall analytical utility. The Cs+/SIMS technique was found to have the best detection limit (5 × 1017 atoms cm-3) and general analytical applicability. Auger electron spectrometry was found to be intermediate in both regards.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-287
Number of pages9
JournalNuclear instruments and methods
Volume167
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 20 1979

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of techniques for depth profiling oxygen in silicon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Mezey, G., Kótai, E., Nagy, T., Lohner, L., Manuba, A., Gyulai, J., Deline, V. R., Evans, C. A., & Blattner, R. J. (1979). A comparison of techniques for depth profiling oxygen in silicon. Nuclear instruments and methods, 167(2), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(79)90016-8